CGP Brazil
Report
"World People's Conference on Climate Change and the Rights of Mother Earth"
19 - 22 April, 2010
Getting there
João Paulo,
Helena (my 4 month old daughter who is breastfed and because of that had to
accompany us to the event) and I arrived in
On the next
day, we woke up and headed straight to Tiquipaya, the community where the event
was being held. Unfortunately, we lost the inauguration (with Evo Morales’
participation), because the line for registration at the Tiquipaya Coliseum was
so huge we thought it just wouldn’t be possible to arrive inside the
accreditation place in less than 3 hours. Because of that, we strategically
chose to get our accreditation as fast as we could and go to Univalle’s campus,
where most of the discussions were being held.
Organizers estimate
over 31.000 people from 142 countries participated in the event and we have to
remember that many, many Europeans were
held back in their countries because of the ashes released by the volcano in
But even
the “waiting in line” part was an interesting moment. People were very friendly
and open and we had the chance to socialize with other participants and the
many Bolivian indigenous peoples (called Cholos) who were also participating
and thought that the way I was carrying my daughter was very interesting. To me
it just seemed we were doing the same thing with different tools and positions.
(picture attached).
On our
first day, we experienced problems with the altitude. Have in mind that
The conference
The work at
the conference was organized under the following participation structure:
a) Working Groups - approximately 45
days before the conference, the participant could join up to 3 out of 17
virtual working groups. Documents on the subjects were exchanged by e-mail and
a very interesting debate was started previously to the event. I chose groups
06, 08 and 15, respectively Climate Migrants, Climate Debt and Carbon
Market.
Although the subject that interested CGP Brazil
the most was Climate Migrants, that was a very slow group, with minor
participation, so I become more involved with the climate debt group which discussion
was definitely more consistent.
Nevertheless, during the event I was not
allowed to participate in the Climate Debt Group, because we could (obviously)
only participate in one working group during the event and I chose Climate
Migrants, at the time of my registration.
b) Many self organized events about
subjects regarding climate change in all its aspects.
c) A large number of panels with
speakers from all over the world, some of them already known by most
environment and social related organizations such as Naomi Klein, Bernard
Cassen, Frei Beto, Vandana Shiva, José Bové, François Houtard and many others.
We had a
hard time deciding in which events we were going to participate. There were so
many interesting discussions being held that it always seemed to me like
whenever we chose a panel or discussion, we were automatically missing an
equally important event elsewhere. And
the area where the event was being held was so big, sometimes we had to consider
this aspect when choosing the activities we wanted to participate or we would
spend our precious time just getting from one place to the other. But we
couldn’t be everywhere so, finally, we decided to focus on the debates related
somehow to the CGP Brazil’s work axes for 2010, which meant the following
panels and discussions:
1) Migrations Forced by Climate Change - Raul Delgado Weiss, Pablo de la Vega, Colin Rajah, Aldo Morrone, Alice Cutler
2) Do we need a world referendum on
climate change? - Bernard Cassen, Amy Goodman, Edigio Brunetto, Joel Marsden,
Vera Mugittu
3) Defining a common strategy after
4) Presentations of the conclusions of
the working groups – Climate Migrants
5) A self organized event called “Trade
Unionists & Green Jobs”, promoted by CUT Brazil with the presences of
Carmen Foro, from CUT, Luis Hernan Paz, from CTA Argentina and Jonathan Neale,
from UCU, England.
Broadly, it
is possible to say that the conference was successful in many ways:
It succeeded
in calling attention to the failure of CoP
A second deployment
of the conference was the announcement of a 2o edition of the conference in
2011, which is great news for all those organizations and movements in need of
an appropriate forum to discuss climate change and build the essential
alliances to support their struggle.
The declaration
that Evo Morales, in person, will lead the peoples delegation heading the UN
headquarters in NY to present the resolutions approved by the conference also
provided empowerment for such action and will draw all lights to the subject
once again and will add on the desired legitimacy for the action.
The
Bolivian president also proposed the beginning of a collective draft of a Universal Declaration of the
Rights of Mother Earth. This, he says, “will establish a legal framework for
protecting our increasingly threatened natural environment and raising the
global consciousness about Mother Earth, on which we all depend for life”.
All these actions
signalize the possibility of bringing together the many marginal voices
fighting separately against climate change. The ground prepared at this meeting
has the potential to help organize and arm organized civil society to fight for
a real solution in terms of climate change.
And,
finally, the most significant outcome of this conference, the document called
“Peoples Agreement” which declares the creation of a
President Evo Morales, who organized
the gathering, also announced plans to mount a referendum of 2 billion people
on solutions to the climate crisis within a year.
For CGP
Brazil, the participation on the self organized event “Trade Unionists &
Green Jobs” was an important step towards the development of a significant work
in the area of green jobs and decent work. In this event, it has been
distributed a hundred of CGP document and the Sammy case brochure about climate
clange. Unfortunately, incredible as it might seem, within the hundreds of
panels, events and work groups this was the ONLY event dealing with the subject
of green jobs, one of the most controversial in debate of climate change
spillovers. Nevertheless, we ceased the opportunity to start conversations with
many union leaders and representatives and organizations related to the union´s
world about the organization of more consistent work (perhaps a movement) to
deal with issues that are both work and climate related. The conclusions
arrived at this event were that green jobs could be the solution to end with
two huge problems: climate change and the enormous rates of unemployment
everywhere in the world.
|
|
|