The Copenhagen climate conference outcomes, or lack of them, leave open a range of questions over when and how the world will move forward on climate action. But perhaps the biggest of them is about where any major decisions on tackling global warming in future are now likely to be taken. That is, inside or outside the United Nations.
Looking back on Copenhagen, commentators have questioned whether the United Nations Framework Convention for Climate Change (UNFCCC) has the capacity to carry such a complex negotiation forward.
If Kyoto 1997 can be said to be the moment when mitigation met the market, Copenhagen 2009 marked the spot where climate change met geopolitics - Carbon Positive's December 24 editorial hit this nail on the head.
Yvo de Boer, a Dutch citizen who announced plans last week to stand down in July after four years, also suggested to Reuters Television that his successor should be from a developing nation.
His departure, which takes effect on July 1, comes after a largely unsuccessful meeting in Copenhagen in December that was supposed to produce a binding international treaty but instead generated mostly acrimony and a series of unenforceable pledges by nations to reduce their global warming emissions.
December's U.N. climate conference in Denmark failed to cite the U.N.-brokered Kyoto pact as a touchstone -- sapping hopes for a global carbon price to guide billions of dollars in investments from nuclear plants to solar panels.
Speaking at a job training centre northeast of Washington Tuesday, President Barack Obama announced the federal government would underwrite the construction of two new reactors to be built in Georgia.
Kööpenhaminan ilmastokokous päättyi niin kutsuttuun Kööpenhaminan asiakirjaan (Copenhagen Accord).